Chapter ten is entitled
As for Soundtracks, I will end my journal entries with chapter ten. Through examples such as
Chapter ten is entitled
As for Soundtracks, I will end my journal entries with chapter ten. Through examples such as
Music and space as “dialectic” (p. 192)
This theme becomes quite drastic when we look at how people in power use sound or music to control space. One example our authors give is Wired Radio Inc., a company that “began to transmit specialist programmes that could be subscribed to by businesses. Programs were implemented as early as World War II (p. 194). We know this system of influence well, as it surrounds us in shopping malls, gas stations, workplaces, transit systems, even elevators. It is interesting to consider the amount of architecture involved on a sonic level. Reminiscent of WWII propaganda films and conspiracy-like thoughts on military brainwashing of the psyche, though perhaps not as severe, we are surrounded by a subtle sonic order. Interesting to note is that Connell and Gibson analyze such order or construction at the Mall of America (pp. 196, 197).
Music and sound on the subconscious level perhaps led to an overt marketing of ambient, lounge music and the multitude of soundscape albums (whales, ocean breakers, winds, rains, jungle). In this case one can set the mood; the listener can program him/herself to raise the likelihood of a desired emotional/mental state.
World Music as a marketing category
World music is perhaps best understood on economic terms. It is a sum of what sells based on anthropologists’ notion of the other, or what is exotic. “Its definition depends on the social, political and demographic position of certain minority groups in a particular country.” (p. 153) Can country music therefore be classified as world music if it, for example, comes out of
We can take the notion of linking music to location by understanding scenes. The construction thereof is best summarized by thinking of music as “made in specific geographical, socio-economic and political contexts, and lyrics and styles are always likely to reflect the positions of writers and composers within these contexts.” Furthermore, “To understand how musical activities may be shaped by places it is necessary to explore local musical practices, institutions, and behavior.” (p. 90)
Connell and Gibson chart out examples of constructed music scenes. They list many, including the “
The notion of origin
I will briefly note the notion of origin brought up by the authors, though I do not wish at this point to reflect thereupon. Connell and Gibson question the authentic roots of certain music genres, an inherently problematic gesture. We attempt a balance between the tangible historical flow of fact and romantic fascination. When and how did punk rock form? Where does electronic music originate? In the case of punk rock, our romanticist urge takes us to
“Fetishisation of locality” (p. 143)
Connell and Gibson look at how lyrics in songs reflect relationships with place. For example, hip-hop lyrics in
Interesting to note is the section entitled See the Noise. This scratches the surface of analyzing the culture of music through visual means. How do visuals reinforce the authentic? The authors brush upon visuals from record sleeves, CD jackets, and music videos. Important here are how the musicians are depicted – clothing, paraphernalia – and their depicted location. Codes are constantly at work, such as in hip-hop: “The neighborhood and the ghetto became the focus of funk and then hip-hop cultures, both in a discursive sense…and physically (as the site of ‘authentic’ performances and cultural roots…).” (p. 85)
In the first chapter Connell and Gibson present the premise of their book, roughly, identity of music as found in the relationship between music and space. The authors introduce the binary of “fixity and fluidity” (pp. 9, 10). This theme is revisited throughout the book in its many manifestations; the authors note: “both ‘fixity’ and ‘fluidity’ operate as umbrella terms that reflect a range of spatial practices, tendencies, decisions and physical objects” (p. 9). When we grapple with the issue of authenticity, a central concept to both Soundtracks and my own research, the above binary becomes very interesting. Does the ethnomusicologist look for ‘traditional’ music fixed in place and origin? How does the researcher incorporate the fluidity of music when describing what is authentic and traditional based on fixity? How may we understand the notion of traditional? We are in a state that both complicates and makes interesting such notions. Dare I mention globalization? Simon and Garfunkel’s El Condor Pasa is a song, now decades old, that is a direct interpolation of a South American ‘traditional’ melody. Several days ago, I heard a Mexican version of the said song. Do origins vanish or are they rewritten? Does ownership denote a moment in time, an accreditation of a musical construction to a person?
Back to the binary of fluidity-fixity: authenticity based thereupon may be paralleled to ‘nature’ as notion. Nature is man’s construct, a reaction to the historic departure from the grasslands of
Connell and Gibson approach this idea, this return to original space, or region from a venturing out: “Metaphors of hybridity, and of fluid, virtual spaces explain only part of the story; mobility triggers new attempts at fixity – holding on to traditions despite losses of popular appeal, constructing spaces for local expressions…marketing music through place and marketing place through music.” Hence, place as a determinant of authenticity in music is at least in part a construct. The authors further discuss copyright as a “crucial concept underpinning fluidity” as it denotes the diffusion of music. Copyright is one instance of a “cultural gatekeeper” (p. 46).
Chapter three delves further into the diffusion of music. A tension exists between how people (be they creators, owners, audience, researchers of a certain music) approach such diffusion: “Though hybridity took different forms in different places, what some took as a threat to local distinctiveness was interpreted elsewhere in a more positive light and, in some cases, fluidity of musical influences provided blueprints for new reclamations of place” (p. 50). The stress exists between the perceived loss of tradition and the perceived opportunity to create anew…
Connell, John and Gibson, Chris. Soundtracks: Popular music, identity and place. Routledge:
In the past half year I have managed to shift my physical location drastically. I began formulating my research proposal in November in
In either case I imagined a situation where looking at the movement of sub-cultural styles into mainstream culture's incorporation would be possible. Specific case ideas I was considering were the Go Go music of DC (from the history of the genre to the appropriations of its styles in popular music) and the production Stomp (again, from the historical roots to popular theatre). In DC, field research on Go Go music would have been unsurpassed as DC is the nucleus of the Go Go scene. In England, I imagined that first world communication amenities and a positive view of a hyper-connected existence would prove more than ample in researching a cultural happening like Go Go that did not originate in England. Critically looking at Stomp in
I could not return to the
My basis for research remains the same. I am interested in how styles in music move. The notion of origin and subsequent cultural evolution perplexes me. Musings thereupon are my starting point. I have chosen physical location of music as the first facet of my research, thus Soundtracks: Popular music, identity and place by Connell and Gibson is my initial reading.